"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated."
Many people are somewhat aware of the problems with beef so they are turning to chicken to satisfy their belief in the need to eat meat. But with nearly 10 billion chickens eaten each year in the United States alone, the message may need to be clearer. There are strong reasons not to eat chicken or poultry in general.
The first thing a consumer should understand when eating chicken, or any other meat for that matter, is that they are eating a dead animal. In this case, they are eating a dead bird. The word “chicken” relates to an animal, NOT to “PROTEIN” or “FOOD”. Knowing this, the consumer will have an improved perception with the following:
Pollution: Raising 10 billion chickens per year creates a tremendous amount of excrement, bedding, silage, chemicals, and dead animals that find their way into our ground and water systems. In Arkansas, nearly every tributary of the Trout river is contaminated with fecal coliform bacteria and nitrates from the nearby poultry farms.
Waste of Resources: It requires 700 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of chicken. Instead, farmers could produce 16 pounds of broccoli, or up to 20 pounds of other grains and vegetables. Over 100 billion gallons of water are used in the US annually for poultry operations which is enough water to meet the domestic needs of 5 million Americans. According to the USDA, it requires 6 pounds of grain to produce 1 pound of chicken meat. Also, it takes 8 times the amount of gasoline/fossil fuel for production of 1 pound of chicken as compared to 1 pound of protein from tofu.
It is obvious that the water, grain, and resources that are used to produce chicken for food could much more efficiently be used to produce grain, vegetables, and fruit directly for human consumption.
1. Cancer Res 1994;54:2390-1
2. Diet, Nutrition and Cancer. National Research Council. 1982
3. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1664-72
4. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48:739-48
5. Nat Cancer Institute
6. Food and Toxicology 1994;32 (6):505-515