The majority of Americans today are convinced that protein is the most important "thing" to eat and their "diet" must revolve around it ("diet" here meaning that which is consumed, ranging in purpose anywhere from a weight loss program to simply maintenance eating). Unfortunately, because of this belief and other misconceptions, consuming too much of the wrong type of protein has caused a less than optimal health state for many individuals. For yet others, it is a major contributing factor to developing chronic, debilitative disease states. Let us look first at the reality of what protein is, and, what it is not.
Protein is an essential human macronutrient, found in many food sources. Protein functions as antibodies, hormones, enzymes, as well as transport and structural components. Your body and its many organs, tissues, and cells use only the protein needed and excess is excreted through the kidneys. It is important to understand the following about protein:
In fact, "energy" is derived most efficiently from carbohydrates; simple for more immediate, and complex for longer term energy. Complex carbohydrates are good carbohydrates and some of the very best nutrients to consume, contrary to what recent diet trends want you to believe (Atkins, South Beach, and The Zone). These carbohydrates are necessary nutrients, providing longer term energy, fiber, and due to being associated with unprocessed, whole foods, are accompanied by antioxidants, phytonutrients, and other micronutrients simply not found anywhere else in one's diet.
The World Health Organization and the Institute of Medicine believe the appropriate protein intake should be .5g to .75 g per kg body weight per day, while the American Heart Association, the National Cholesterol Education Program, and the American Cancer Society all recommend a diet where only 10% to 15% of calories are derived from protein. This translates into no more than 56 grams of protein for a 170 pound male adult and 48 grams for a 140 pound female. Most Americans easily consume two to three times this amount even though it is not needed. Those on a high protein-low carbohydrate diet can consume 5 or 6 times the required amount. So, what is the significance of this? There are two serious issues to be concerned with: 1) the demand this excessive protein places on the body and 2) the demand this false feeling of the need for protein places on our environment.
As stated by the American Dietetic Association, high protein-low carbohydrate diets are "not recommended" and "potentially hazardous" (5). There have been literally hundreds of medical publications and numerous organizations arriving at the same conclusion that excessive protein, particularly animal protein, is unhealthy. Some of these organizations making a blanketed position statement against a high animal protein-low carbohydrate diet are the American Dietetic Association, American Heart Association, Cleveland Heart Clinic, Mayo Clinic, American Cancer Society, American Institute for Cancer Research, American Kidney Fund, World Cancer Research Fund, the Heat and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the American Academy of Pediatrics. All of these organizations and many others call for "a diet based on a variety of plant foods, including grain products, vegetables, and fruits to reduce risk of major chronic diseases" (6, 7, 8, 9, 10). The reason is because high protein diets, particularly those of animal origin can cause the following health problems among others:
The American Institute for Cancer Research Diet and Health Guidelines call for "eating a variety of vegetables, fruits, whole grains and beans." These high-carbohydrate foods should push the protein and fat from animal sources to the side of your plate. Following a mostly plant-based diet and exercising regularly can help you slowly lose weight without undermining your health."
The real cost of protein in the form of animal meat is not reflected in what is paid at the food store counter whether it is beef, pork, poultry, or fish. That is because the store price does not take into consideration all the resources, environmental change, and waste necessary for production of the meat. The destroyed forests and habitat, topsoil loss, billions of gallons of water consumed, fossil fuels used, unnecessary land use, and contribution to air and water pollution by the meat industry is immense. Seventy percent of all the grain produced and over 50% of our water consumption in America is used to feed animals which are then killed to be eaten. All of this is fueled by the false belief of Americans that high levels of protein from animals must be eaten. David Brubaker, at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, who studied our current food animal industry stated, "The way we breed animals for food is a threat to the planet. It pollutes our environment while consuming huge amounts of water, grain, petroleum, pesticides, and drugs. The results are disastrous." In addition to the 240 billion pounds of unsustainable sea creatures taken from the oceans each year for food, there are more than 57 billion pounds of sea life killed and discarded as unwanted by products including turtles and dolphins, estimates the United Nation's Food and Agriculture Organization.
For the past 30 years, hundreds of articles appearing in numerous medical and nutrition journals have concluded that protein in the form of animal meat is unhealthy. Despite this, very few Americans are aware of the facts or are not concerned and have not changed their eating habits. It is a great irony that the traditional plant based diet consumed by those in poorer, less developed countries supports a hard working lifestyle and is one that is relatively free of chronic diseases. In America and other developed countries, plant based diets are abandoned, replaced by meat, fat, and processed foods which causes a rise in obesity and many chronic diseases. The myth that we must consume large amounts of animal protein is driven by the meat and dairy industry and the large lobbying force they command. For instance, even when testimony was presented to eat less meat and dairy products when establishing the Dietary Goals for the United States in 1977, wording was changed in the document to skew reality and promote continued meat and milk sales due to the Committee receiving strong protests from the National Cattlemen's Association and the National Milk Producers Association (27). This, unfortunately, is what occurs frequently behind the scenes to keep America thinking that milk, meat, and high amounts of protein are necessary. This industry is then, responsible for our current inefficient use of land and other resources to produce food. Approximately 10 pounds of grain and soybean protein are fed to a cow for every one pound of meat produced. It takes 50 to 60 times more water to produce one pound of meat than it does to produce one pound of grain and vegetables. This is simply not an efficient way to produce food. Wouldn't it make more sense to grow crops and use water directly for human consumption? The drive for more protein in the form of meat combined with blatant inefficient use of our resources seems senseless considering there are 15 million children who die of starvation each year worldwide according to the World Hunger Organization.
An alarming 64% of all Americans are considered obese or overweight. This is because we are simply eating too many calories per day, and it is the wrong food being too high in animal protein and refined carbohydrates, saturated and trans fat. Diets high in animal protein increase the risk of a number of diseases including kidney, liver, coronary heart, gall and kidney stones, and cancer. High animal protein diets place an uneccessary burden on our environment. The myth of needing more protein is driven by the meat and dairy industry and certain cultural aspects.
1. Young VR, Pellett PL. Plant proteins in relation to human protein and amino acid nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59: 1203s-1212s.
2. Rand WM, Pellett PL, Young VR. Meta-analysis of nitrogen balance studies for estimating protein requirements in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:109-127.
3. American Dietetic Association, Dietitians of Canada, the American College of Sports Medicine, Nutrition and athletic performance-Position Paper. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:1543-1556.
4. Haddad EH. Vegetarian diets and dietary guidelines for chronic disease prevention:How meatless diets conform to current recommendations for healthy eating In:Sabate J. ed. Vegetarian Nutrition. Boca Raton, Fl"CRC Press;200:371-409.
5. Position Paper on Food and Nutrition Misinformation, Journal of the American Dietetic Association 66:277.
6. World Cancer Research Fund/AICR, Food, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC:AICR; 1997.
7. Byers t, Nestle M, et al. American Cancer Society 2001 Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition for cancer prevention: Reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:92-119.
8. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Healthy Eating.
9. Deckelbaum Rj, Fisher EA, Winston M et al. Summary of a scientific conference on preventive nutrition: Pediatrics to geriatrics. Circulation. 1999;100:450-456.
10. American Institute for Cancer Research Newsletter 67 (2000):11.
11. Ball D, Maughan RJ: Glood and urine acid-base status of premenopausal omnivorous and vegetarian women. Br J Nutr 78:683-693, 1997.
12. Lemann J Jr: Relationship between urinary calcium and net acid excretion as determined by dietary protein and potassium: A review. Nephron 81:S18-S25, 1999 (suppl 1).
13. Robertson WG, Heyburn PJ, Peacock M, Hanes FA, Swaminathan R: The effect of high animal protein intake on the risk of calcium stone formation in the urinary tract. Clin Sci (Colch) 57:285-288, 1979.
14. Sellmeyer DE, Stone KL, Sebastian A, Cummings SR. A high ratio of dietary animal to vegetable protein increases the rate of bone loss and risk of fracture Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73:118-122.
15. Fellstro0m B, Danielson BG, Karlstrom B, Lithell, H, Ljunghall S, Vessby B: The influence of a high dietary intake of purine-rich animal protein on urinary excretion and supersaturation in renal stone disease. Clin Sci (Colc) 64:399-405, 1983.
16. Kok DJ, Lestra JA, Doorenbos CJ, Papapoulos SE: The effects of dietary excesses in animal protein and in sodium on the composition and the crystallization kinetics of calcium oxalate monohydrate inurines of healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:861-867, 1990.
17. Fraser GE. Associations between diet and cancer, ischemic heart disease, and all cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California Seventh Day Adventists. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:532S-538S.
18. Chang-Claulde J, Frenntzel-Beyme R. Dietary and lifestyle determinants of mortality among German vegetarians. Int J Epidemiol 1993;22:228-36.
19. Phillips RL. Role of lifestyle and dietary habits in risk of cancer among Seventh-Day Adventists. Cancer Res (Suppl) 1975;35:3513-22.
20. National Research Council, Committee on Scientific and Regulatory Issues: Regulating Pesticides in Food, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1987.
21 American Heart Association: Statement of the AHA Nutrition Committee, Circulation 104(2001):1869.
22. Stevens A, Robinson DP, Turpin J, Groshong T, Tobias JD. Sudden cardiac death of an adolescent during dieting Sout Med J. 2002;95:1047-9.
23. Mahon KL, Escott-Stump. Krause's Food, Nutrition, and Diet Therapy. 9th ed. W.B. Saunders Co., 1996..
24. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 68(2001):761-774.
25. Mahon KL, Wscott-Stump. Krause's Food, Nutrition, and Diet Therapy. 9th ed. W. B. Saunders Co., 1996.
26. Manore MM, Barr LL, Butterfield GE. Nutrition and athletic performance:position of the American Dietetic Association, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sprots Medicine. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:1543-56.
27. Nestle M. Food Politics. University of California Press. Berkeley 2003.